![]() ![]() ![]() Lies the issue of whether regular past tenses -those that differ from the Tense has been a major endeavor in cognitive psychology. Titled “On learning the past tenses of English verbs,”Ĭharacterizing the acquisition, production and comprehension of the English past Parallel Distributed Processing, which included a chapter Since the publication in 1986 of Rumelhart and McClelland’s This dissociation is more consistent with single- than with dual-system models WeĪrgue that although we observe a regular-irregular dissociation, the nature of Regular verbs, which were statistically indistinguishable from one another. Priming for strong verbs was reliably stronger than that for weak irregular and Irregular verbs into two categories (weak irregular and strong) revealed that Phonological controlĬonditions suggested that differences in formal overlap between prime and targetĬontributes to, but does not account for this difference, suggesting a linkīetween irregular morphology and semantics. We present N400Įvent-related potential data from healthy participants using the same design.īoth regular and irregular past-tense forms primed corresponding present-tenseįorms, but with a longer duration for irregular verbs. Past-tense primes immediately precede present-tense targets. Past-tense morphology have been reported using a lexical-decision task in which Neuropsychological dissociations between regular and irregular English ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |